Who Gets to Belong?

 

Week 9 - 10/24/2019

“The politics of belonging includes also struggles around the determination of what is involved in belonging, in being a member of a community, and of what roles specific social locations and specific narratives of identity play in this. As such, it encompasses contestations both in relation to the participatory dimension of citizenship as well as in relation to issues of the status and entitlements such membership entails” (p. 205).

- Nira Yuval-Davis

 

summary

In Week 1 Who Gets To Belong, we address the ways in which Black and Brown communities in Philadelphia have been pushed out and are excluded from belonging. Systems such as gentrification and Penntrification have been responsible for pricing out tenants and weakening thriving cultural and artistic spaces.


Class Readings


Opening Reflection

Identify spaces on the Penn Campus where you feel like you belong or don’t belong. Circle the places you feel like you belong and X the spaces you feel like you don’t belong. What makes you feel like you belong or don’t belong in these spaces?

 
 

Based on our understanding of belonging and the politics of belonging what communities and people get to belong in Philadelphia? 


Class Conversation

  • Residential and economic segregation of Philadelphia

  • Penntrification - physical and cultural displacement by Penn as an institution

  • Seventh Ward in Philadelphia - you see relics of black life, but no black people in that area today

 

Researching Sites of Erasure


In class, we broke up into small groups to research four sites of erasure in what is presently Philadelphia: the Charnae Wise Mural, the Royal Theatre, the Move Bombing, and the 1937 Walking Purchase. Undertaking this research, we asked several guiding questions:

What is no longer there? What has been changed? Who and/or what systems have driven that change?

Charnae Wise Mural:

  • Mural memorializing deceased girl was covered up by Philadelphia Mural Arts Project

  • Framed as community decision, but community there has changed a lot via gentrification

  • Narratives of black criminality in news stories describing the story of the mural

  • Sanitization and abstraction of spaces and conflict with “peacemaking” murals

  • Whose work is consider art? Whose work is considered worthy of preserving? Relationships to social capital

Royal Theater:

  • First black-owned theater in Philadelphia

  • Closed in 1970

  • Has been vacant for decades

  • New development has kept the facade of the theater. Is this historical preservation? Is there a way to integrate the aesthetics of the building without coopting/appropriating?

  • One interpretation: development wants the facade of blackness, but not the substance

  • There had been efforts to save the theater - historical landmark recognition would have protected theater from developers, but not granted by the city. Developer gets to scoop up property once it has been devalued and to raise the prices of property around it.

MOVE bombing:

  • City of Philadelphia coordinated bombing of two square blocks where black commune was located

  • Narratives constructed around MOVE frame people as uncompliant and violent

  • 1985 Bombing - MOVE moved to Osage Ave in West Philadelphia. Dropped a bomb, and purposefully did not put out the fire to kill the adults, children, and animals in the houses.

  • MOVE still exists, still fighting

    • Environmentalists

    • 2 of 9 arrested in shootout have been released. 5 have died in prison.

  • Homes in that area are still boarded up. Now being developed into luxury apartments.

  • State sanctions who gets to belong and who gets to be a citizen. Bombing is a demonstration of the denial of belonging and citizenship.

The 1737 walking purchase:

  • Indigenous/Lenape conceptions of land ownership were different from Western conceptions of land ownership.

  • White settlers created a fraudulent treaty between William Penn and the Lenape Nation and in a land grab, stole 1, 110 square miles of Lenape land.

  • Delaware Tribe in Oklahoma has federal recognition - governmental signal is that people must have experienced removal to receive federal protections. Those who were left behind are not viewed as legitimate

  • Violence of nation and state as framework and logic

  • How do we think about reparative justice? How do we not recirculate concept of land ownership in reparation of the land?

  • How do we think about scholarship, when erasure has been so violent?