Engaging Communities and Publics
Week 6 - 10/3/2019
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum doloroident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
- Author, Book Linked, p. xx
Openings
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum doloroident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
How do we understand the public(s) and communities imagined in public and community engagement?
Re/imagining engagement, communities, publics
Eve Tuck. (2009). “Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities.” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 409–428.
M.E. Torre et al. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In Camic, P. & Cooper, H. (Eds.). The handbook of qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design, 2nd edition (pp. 171-184).
Michael Warner. (2002). “Publics and Counterpublics” Public Culture, Volume 14, Number 1, Winter 2002, pp. 49-90.
What are the risks and responsibilities of forms of public and community engagement, particularly those that endeavor to critique or transform power structures?
Academic Freedom in the Digital Age
Michael Bérubé. 2019. MLA Profession. “Talking out of School: Academic Freedom and Extramural Speech.”
Judith Butler. 2018. Chronicle of Higher Education. “The Criminalization of Knowledge.”
Steven Salaita. 2019. Chronicle of Higher Education. “My Life as a Cautionary Tale: Probing the Limits of academic freedom.”
Penn and Philadelphia Communities
Penn and Slavery
Vanjessica Gladney. Feb. 28 2018. “We Challenged Penn to Reexamine Its History of Slavery—And Our Project Isn't Over.”34thStreet.
Abul-Aliy Muhammad. July 21 2019. “As reparations debate continues, the University of Pennsylvania has a role to play.” The Philadelphia Inquirer.
What can we learn from models of engagement with communities that are participatory, desire-centered, or anti-oppressive in purpose and practice?
Modeling Community and Public Engagement
The Marian Cheek Jackson Center: Soundwalk of Northside
Morris Justice Project (Bronx, New York)
Taja Lindley: The Bag Lady Manifesta. “This Ain’t a Eulogy: A Ritual for Re-Membering.” (Running time: 10 min)
Rasheeda Phillips: Community Futures Lab (North Philadelphia)
Torn Apart/Separados mapping project
Class Recap
oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor oident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. Lorem ipsum dolor
Quotes from Class Notes
Universities position themselves as apolitical, concerned with objective truth. But there is no such thing as political neutrality in education.
Much of academic research that purports to be a critique of oppression is centered in “damage-centered” research.
Damage-centered research is invested in reparative justice (413): focuses on past harm, calls for reparations. Communities tolerate this data-gathering as a strategy for combating oppression. But is this theory of change actually effective? Does the loss of complex personhood outweigh the benefits of reparations?
Damage-centered approach can be an initial step, but it’s not sufficient. Reparations can support improvements in material conditions, increase health of communities. Advocacy based on damage doesn’t fully address social structures like racism, as perhaps approaches that include complex personhood, beyond victimhood.
Recognition of community knowledge and expertise - we need the community as partners in research, partners in design, partners in inquiry. We can’t design questions and solutions on our own, when we are complicit.
What are the tensions between academic freedom and political expression?
Could educators create a review board? Most schools don’t have the capacity to say no to institutions like Penn.